A&A
November 24, 2017
The Supreme Court while discussing the merits in the case of Uttara Foods and Feeds Private Limited vs Mona Pharmachem, has suggested an amendment permitting for settlement between the parties even after the admission of case under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”). At present, the Code and subsequent Rules (defined hereinafter) only permit withdrawal of a case before its admission by the Tribunal.
An appeal was filed by the corporate debtor, Uttara Foods and Feeds Private Limited, in the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution (inherent powers of the Supreme Court) which allows the Supreme Court to “pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.” The appeal was filed because the corporate debtor was not given the relief by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal owing to lack of authority under the Code to do so.
The apex court took in record the settlement and expressed a view to amend the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 (“Rules”) so as to include such inherent powers so as to obviate such unnecessary appeals before the Supreme Court.
Get insights into RBI's regulatory measures with two new draft directions designed to oversee Payment Aggregators, shaping the future of financial transactions.
View MoreExplore SEBI's recent actions to bolster investor protection during dematerialized securities transfers, ensuring transparency and security in the financial market.
View MoreCCPA partners with ASCI to combat misleading ads, ensuring consumer protection and fair advertising practices.
View MoreWe use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. Read more...
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. Read more...