A&A
November 25, 2017
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”) has recently held that the jurisdiction of the consumer forum to entertain a complaint is not ousted on account of a civil suit having been instituted by the opposite party, even if the subject matter of the said suit is the same agreement which is the foundation of the consumer complaint.
It was observed that the remedy available under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“Act”) is an additional remedy for a consumer. It is up to the consumer to avail whichever remedy deems fit, be it before the civil court or before the consumer forum.
NCDRC opined that construction of flats and handing over the same to the allottees by the builder creates a relationship of ‘consumer and service provider’ and this relationship does not come to end on account of one of the parties cancelling the said agreement. If deficiency on the part of the service provider in rendering services to the consume is proved, the consumer would be entitled to appropriate relief in terms of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Dive into the recent ruling by the Bombay High Court clarifying the concept of 'supervisory work' within the framework of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, offering valuable legal clarity and implications.
View MoreIndian Government opens space sector for foreign investments: Amendment signals major boost for satellite industry
View MoreGet insights into RBI's regulatory measures with two new draft directions designed to oversee Payment Aggregators, shaping the future of financial transactions.
View MoreWe use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. Read more...
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. Read more...